2000 (2) TMI 530
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - None has come present on behalf of the appellants in spite of service of notice to them on the correct address. There is no request for adjournment also from their side. The matter is an old one as it pertains to the year 1992 and therefore, we proceed to decide the same on merits after hearing the SDR, Shri Satnam Singh. 2. The....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ctor (Appeals) in the appellants' own case in Appeal No. 376-CE/DLI/92, dated 15-7-1992. Since the earlier order holding the classification of items in question under Heading 86.07 of the Central Excise Tariff had become final between the parties, the Assistant Collector in the order in original was perfectly within his right to follow the same and to classify the items under that very heading. Th....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI