2001 (7) TMI 349

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ravindra Baboo, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J) ].   The appellants filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal dated 31-10-1994. In the impugned order the formulations manufactured by the appellants Salbutamol inhaler was held to be classifiable under sub-heading 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 Patent or Proprietary medicaments. 2. &emsp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tionship between the marks and medicines. Therefore, he prays that the appeal be allowed. 3.  Learned JDR appearing on behalf of the Revenue submits that the appellants were clearing the product in question under their name 'Glaxo' and the word 'Glaxo' appearing on the level shows that the relationship between mark and the medicines. He, therefore, prays that the appeal be dismissed. 4.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The National Formulary of India; (d)  The British Pharmacopoeia; (e)  The British Pharmaceutical Codex; (f)  The United States Pharmacopoeia; (g)  The National Formulary of the U.S.A.; (h)  The Dental Formulary of the U.S.A.; (i)  The Dental Formulary of the U.S.A./ and; (j)  The State Pharmacopoeia of the U.S.S.R. or which is a brand name....