2001 (5) TMI 223

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3180/93-A and E/1668/94-A. All these appeals came up for final hearing on 14-8-1998. Since the Tribunal did not have time to take up these matters they were adjourned. Three appeals, namely, E/1574/93-A, E/1668/94-A and E/3180/93-A were adjourned to 16-9-1998. The fourth appeal, namely, E/1621/93-A was adjourned to 17-9-1998. 2. On 16-9-1998 when the three appeals, namely, E/1574/93-A, E/1668/94-A and E/3180/93-A were taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. This Tribunal heard the Learned Departmental Representative and disposed of those appeals. Tribunal announced dismissal of these appeals on 16-9-1998 and reasoned order was to be dictated later. 3. When appeal E/1621/93-A was called f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... have the entire issue revived by moving earlier applications filed for recall of the Final Orders 1348-1350/98-A. 6. As stated earlier, the three appeals referred to above were disposed of on 16-9-1998 by Final Order Nos. 1348-1350/98-A. Along with the application for rectification of mistakes referred to hereinbefore, they also filed restoration application (ROA) on 3-12-1998. Appellant did not take any step to have that application posted before the Tribunal. Learned Counsel representing the appellant while moving the ROM also did not ask the Tribunal to have the ROA also posted for disposal. Only when it was found that their attempt to get the Modvat credit allowed failed, they sought to rake up the issue. At the instance of the....