2001 (2) TMI 353

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....K. Das, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The above applications have filed for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 1,54,42,723.43 confirmed against M/s. Haryana Cables Industries, along with the penalty equal to amount of duty imposed under Section 11AC read with relevant Rules and confirmation of duty demand of Rs. 89,38,564.08 against M/s. Deepak C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....emption limit for SSI unit. 3. We have heard the ld. JDR and perused the records since none appeared for the applicants in spite of notice. We find that in paragraph 88 of the impugned order there is admission by the proprietor of M/s. Haryana Cables Industries that the duty was payable and had not been paid by him and that he would deposit the duty. Similarly there is an admission by the ....