Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (12) TMI 401

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....k, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order].  The Revenue has filed the above application for reference of the following question of law stated to have arisen out of Tribunal's Final order No. A/533/99-NB, dated 29-6-1999 : "Whether CEGAT is justified in allowing credit on certificate issued under Rule 57E of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 after six months of the date of issue of the sa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unal which held that the limitation period under Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules for taking credit from 29-6-1995 does not operate with retrospective effect. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench decision in the case of TELCO v C.C.E., Bombay [1996 (87) E.L.T. 157] and set aside the impugned order and restored the order passed by the Additional Commissioner. Hence, this reference applicat....