Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (12) TMI 369

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [Order per : Lajja Ram, Member (T)]. -  The matter was called. No one appeared for the appellants M/s. Gokul Metallizers Pvt. Ltd. The notice for today's hearing was issued on 9-11-2000 and was duly acknowledged by the appellants. In their communication dated 13-11-2000 they have stated as under :- "We shall be obliged if you will give us a revised date of hearing to take place after 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er in appeal. 2. We have heared Dr. D.K. Verma, SDR and gone through the facts on record. We find that the matter is covered by the Supreme Court decision in the case of CCE, Kanpur v. Floc India Pvt. Ltd. - 2000 (120) E.L.T. 285 (S.C.). The honourable Supreme Court had held that where an adjudicating authority has passed an order which is appealable in the statute and the party aggrieved ....