Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (12) TMI 332

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellants. Shri Sanjeev Srivastava, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K. Sreedharan, President]. - In Samrat International (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise reported in 1992 (58) E.L.T. 561, their Lordships of the Supreme Court took the view that pending finalisation of the classification list or price list, the duty paid for clearing the goods would be provisional. In ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... period in question was a provisional payment, they shall be entitled to the benefit of the ratio of the judgment of this Court in Samrat International's case (supra)." Thus, the Supreme Court in the later decision in the case of Coastal Gases & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. did not deviate from the ratio laid down by their Lordships in the earlier decision in Samrat International Pvt. Ltd. Considering t....