TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2000 (10) TMI 436
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Advocate, for the Appellants. S/Shri S. Kannan and S. Sudarsan, DRs, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - These four stay applications and four appeals arising out of the order in original passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore are taken up for final order after granting waiver of pre-deposit of the amounts and stay of recovery of the same as the i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on of the Investigating Officers vide their replies to the show cause notice. The comments given by the Bangalore Commissionerate Officers vide their above cited letters had admitted this fact. Very strangely these letters convey that even though request for cross examination was made in the written reply to the show cause notice, the request was not repeated at the personal hearing and/or when th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ther solemnly stated that the Commissioner of Customs did not adjourn the case or grant another opportunity for cross-examination of the Investigating officers. This is an admitted position by the Commissionerate officers that request for cross-examination of the Investigating Officers have been made and their stand that the plea for cross-examination was not repeatedly made cannot be accepted. It....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....While hearing this case, a question was put from the Bench pointing out that in the order of adjudication at internal page 36 thereof has recorded that the goods totally valued at Rs. 2,00,37,350/- were confiscated under the provisions of Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. However, since the said goods had been disposed of after taking necessary permission as required under Section 110 of th....