2000 (12) TMI 278

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant. Shri Rajiv Tandon, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Shri Amit Awasthi, learned Counsel arguing the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, submits that the applicants had applied for re-determination of the capacity of their re-rolling mill after opting for payment of duty under Rule 96ZP(3). He submits that the Department provisionally fixed t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Department. He submits that in view of these facts, there is no question of payment of duty demanded for this period. The learned Counsel submits that they are ready to pay the differential duty of Rs. 1.65 lakhs for the period when the factory was working. He submits that even for the period during which the factory was working, the Department has demanded Rs. 21,87,691/- which is calculated on ....