Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (11) TMI 394

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant. Shri P.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Justice K. Sreedharan, President]. -  In this appeal M/s. Electricity Poles Mfg. Unit, controlled by the Government of Uttar Pradesh, questions the correctness of Order-in-Appeal No. 324-CE MRT/2000, dated 22-5-2000. As per that order the Commissioner (Appeals) modified Order-in-Original passed by the Assistant Commissioner....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he amount so short levied during the period from October, 1995 to March, 1998 was found to be Rs. 72,491.40. 3. Appellant's contention is that they were not the manufacturer of the poles. They got those poles manufactured by independent contractors and those contractors must be treated as manufacturers for the purpose of excise law. This argument prima facie does not appeal to us on accoun....