Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (11) TMI 353

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant. Shri Mewa Singh, DR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. -  Arguing on the application for condonation of delay of three months in preferring the above appeal against the order dated 21-3-2000 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise who has partly disallowed the abatement claim filed by the applicants who are operating an Induction Furnace f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n their case has been vacated and that they should pay duty on lumpsum basis. He submits that the applicants were under a bona fide belief that since duty liability had already been calculated on actual production basis up to 31-1-2000 covering the period relating to the abatement claim, the order disallowing abatement was non-est, and therefore, there was no necessity to challenge the same by fil....