Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (10) TMI 337

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant. Shri A. Chopra, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - The appellant in 1987 and 1988 at the relevant time manufactured component units of automatic data processing system, peripherals, as also goods such as cards for using central processing units of such system and accessories such as switch mode power supply. The appellant in its classification li....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onitors, keyboards Rs. 10,91,880/- Computer systems and peripherals Rs.  4,25,700/- Switch mode power supply Rs.  8,41,044/- 3. The department took the view that the switch mode power supply was rightly classifiable under heading 84.73. If that is the case the value of clearances under heading 84.73 would be Rs. 19,35,923/-. The value of clearances of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arance under this heading. 6. It cannot be disputed that the monitors and keyboards are in fact rightly classifiable under heading 84.71. A reading of the headings of the tariff indicates it to be so. The fact that the goods were so classified for the period 188 also reinforces this contention. We find it difficult to accept the appellant's contention that the department compelled it to cl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... which the appellant has paid the duty. 8. The Collector attempts to deny the notification by saying that even if the appellant's contention is accepted the benefit of the notification still will not be available because the value of goods classifiable under one chapter exceeds to be Rs. 15 lakhs. At the relevant time however, the notification did not allocate the clearances of duty of goo....