1998 (11) TMI 362

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ]oshi, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S.V. Singh, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : K.S. Venkataramani, Vice President]. - The application is for dispensing with the predeposit of total duty demand of Rs. 25,72,017.82 as well as Rs. 757 and Rs. 8878 besides the penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on the applicants M/s. Aditya Polymers (P) Ltd. and an equal amount of penalty on the applicant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....led evidence to show that the job workers are independent units which has not been duly considered. The Commissioner has also rejected the claim of the ap­plicants that they should be granted Modvat credit on the inputs. It was fur­ther submitted that an amount of Rs. 9,26,976 has already been paid by the applicants which was held to be payable by one of their job workers. In these circums....