2000 (3) TMI 470

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....chalam, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order]. - The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Muzaffarnagar Division has denied the Modvat credit of Rs. 26,159/- to the appellants availed by them on open forgings falling under SH 7326.90. The Modvat credit was availed by them under Rule 57Q. The Assistant Commissioner in his order dated 29-4-1997 has held that classification of this item is und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e challenging the above findings. I have heard Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate for the appellants and Shri T.A. Arunachalam, DR for the Revenue. The Ld advocate for the appellants has submitted that his clients received forged proof machine rollers and shafts which were subjected to shelling and grooving to convert them into roller by the job workers. The roller is part of sugar mills machinery and is c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... forgings were subject to operations like machining and milling etc; that in its absence, such forgings could not be used with any machine and it has no specific function related to the sugar manufacture. The Ld. JDR for the Revenue submits that firstly the contention relating to the applicability of rule 57D(2) has not been raised at any stage of the proceedings before the lower authorities and s....