2000 (1) TMI 435
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cisions)<br>Dated:- 21-1-2000<br> E/3720/99-Mum - 346-347/2000-WZB/C-I<br>Central Excise<br>Shri G.N. Srinivasan, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri K.V. Sahasrabudhe, Consultant, for the Appellant. Shri ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s (India) Ltd. v. CCE - 1993 (63) E.L.T. 3 are in favour of the appellant. I am aware of the fact that this case involves interpretation of Rule 57Q but that was a case involving Rule 57A. But this is....
TaxTMI