Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (1) TMI 424

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri H.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The classification of aluminium paint in dual pack manufactured and cleared by the appellants herein, arises for determination in the present appeal. The appellants claim that the product falls for classification under 3212.90 as "pigments ..... dispersed in non-aqueous media, in liquid or paste form, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt ready for use. According to Note 2 to Section VI (covering Chapters 28 to 38) "goods put up in sets consisting two or more separate constituents, some or all of which fall in this Section and are intended to be mixed together to obtain a product of Section VI or VII, are to be classified in the heading appropriate to that product, provided that the constituents are : (a) having regard t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 32,872.00 3. 3.4.92  Sep., 91 to Feb., 92 12,667.00 4. 15.7.92 March, 92 to June, 92 16,938.00 5. 11.9.92 July, 92 to Aug., 92 17,115.00 Classification lists for the period covered by the first 3 show cause notices were approved and the disputed product was cleared in accordance with the approved classification lists. Therefore, the demands for the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r of Central Excise, Madras reported in 1999 (108) E.L.T. 361 (T) = 1999 (32) RLT 1, wherein it has been held that the total duty proposed to be demanded shall have to be abated from the cum-duty price actually received and that any hyphothetical consideration that the sale price would have gone up had correct duty been paid in the first instance cannot be made the basis for non-abatment of differ....