1999 (11) TMI 457
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....shokan, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Today the stay petition No. E/Stay-778/99 has been placed for hearing. Since the question lies in a narrow campus the appeal itself is taken up for disposal with the consent of both the parties after waiving pre-deposit. 2. Appellant is a SSI unit, manufacturing medicaments falling under Chapter 30 of the CETA, 1985. They fulfilled all the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1-8-1997 to 16-9-1997 on the ground that no declaration under Rule 57G was filed. 3. The Assistant Commissioner who passed the adjudicating order decided against the assessee. On appeal the appellate authority by the impugned order rejected the contentions raised by the assessee. Hence the present appeal. 4. Shri Birader, Ld. Advocate appeared for the appellant and Shri A. Ashokan,....
TaxTMI