Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (1) TMI 380

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndents. [Order]. -  In this appeal the question involved is whether Collector under Rule 173H can fix the time limit of six months. 2.  The facts of the case are that the assessee is a manufacture of tractors and parts thereof. They have cleared three tractors under different gate passes in the month of February 1992, July 1992 and October 1992, on payment of duty. They were rec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... file an application for extension of the above period. The Collector also held that Rule 173H(3) empowers the Collector to lay down conditions for duty free clearance under the said Rule. Hence the appeal by the assessee. 3.  It is found by the reading of Rule 173H no condition of six months for removal of the goods has been mentioned, if that is the case. It is doubtful whether the depar....