1999 (7) TMI 375
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. - The Applicants filed this application for waiver of duty demanded Rs. 1,00,97,626/- and penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs. 2. Appearing on behalf of the Applicants Shri Velapally, Sr. Advocate submitted that the Tribunal vide Final Order E/979/98-B1, dated 15-7-1998 remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority with the directions to decide the cor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....upon the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in their own case reported in 1997 (94) E.L.T. 477 (S.C.). He therefore prays the application uphold. 3. Shri R.D. Negi, ld. SDR, appeared on behalf of the Revenue and submitted that the Adjudicating Authority complying with the directions of the remand order passed by the Tribunal given his specific findings that the goods are marketable and are class....