TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2000 (9) TMI 357
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....[Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Shri Kapil Vaish, ld. CA submits that a mistake has crept in, in the Tribunal's Final Order Nos. 180-81/2000-NB, dated 1-3-2000 - [2000 (119) E.L.T. 611 (Tribunal)]. He submits that this order of the Tribunal disposed of 2 appeals No. E/1230/97-NB and E/1323/97-NB. He submits that in para 7, the Tribunal has rejected their claim on the ground that the perm....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fic request in the memo of appeal and also that this point was argued before the Tribunal. He, therefore prays that the above mistake may be rectified. 2. Shri S.K. Das, ld. JDR submits that insofar as the question of letter for permission being present in the records is concerned, he submits that this point does not find mention in the pleas adduced at the time of hearing the appeal. He als....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssion under Rule 57T was filed before the Asstt. Commissioner. We further note that it is not the question of filing of letter, the question of obtaining permission. Since this question does not appear to have been raised before us either at the time of hearing the appeals or in the appeal memo, we do not see that any mistake has crept in, therefore the application for rectification of mistake in ....