Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (8) TMI 440

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant. Shri Ram Chandra Choudhary, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. - Revenue has filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal dated 27-1-2000. In the impugned Order the Commissioner (Appeals), after following the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Vikas Engineering Associates v. CCE, Allahabad reported in 1995 (78) E.L.T. 219, held that the Bus Du....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the facts in the case of CCE v. KLK Electrical Industries; that in the present case bus ducts in question are not insulated and no sheathing fibre or fibre segregation is used and these are only meant for low tension system therefore, bus ducts manufactured by the respondents, are without segregation, without phased manner and without porcelain insulators. He submits that in the case of CCE v. KL....