Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (8) TMI 437

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....udarsan, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - This appeal and stay petition are taken up together as the issue involved is in a narrow compass and as already remanded back eight orders vide order Nos. 1081-1088/2000, dated 11-8-2000 and final order No. 696/2000. 2. The issue involved is that certain garments were exported by filing shipping bills on or bef....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....has allowed the subject shipment for export. We have held in a similar cases that cross-examination of this officer were sine qua non to determine whether the examination of the goods was conducted and if so at what place, what premises and what date, so that the issue in the matter can be resolved. Since this aspect of the officer's cross-examination was not conducted in earlier case by the adjud....