Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (8) TMI 346

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order]. - The appeal is against the order of the Commissioner confiscating the ship M.V. Vasility Vereshchecin under Section 115(2) of the Act and permitted its redemption on payment of fine of Rs. 3 lakhs and imposing penalty of Rs. 1 lakh on the appellant who was the agent of the master of the vessel. 2. The Collector has found that the ship carried 13 motor ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....surrendered to the customs. The owners of four of these cars were not present on the ship because they left Bulgus after they arranged to meet the ship at Vladivostok. Therefore, the master of the vessel has behaved bona fide through out in respect of these cars, the presence of which at Alang was on account of factor beyond his control. There is therefore no case for confiscation or penalty. 4....