Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (8) TMI 337

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellants. Shri J.M. George, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. -  Out of the total duty demanded of Rs. 16,61,822.44 a sum of Rs. 4,15,456/- has already been paid in cash. The duty has been demanded on the ground that the refund sanctioned to the applicant by extending the benefit of Notification 115/86 was incorrect. 2. Notification 115/86....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ters. 3. After hearing both sides we are satisfied that applicant has a strong prima facie case on both these aspects. Explanation 4 to the notification is not a pre-condition for availing the benefit of the notification itself but sets out two different basis for claiming it. It is settled law that benefit of a notification can be claimed at any stage. Prima facie the claim for exemption ....