Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (5) TMI 327

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondents. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - In this appeal, the Revenue has challanged the order-in-appeal dated 9-1-1995 of the Collector (Appeals) vide which he had reversed the order of the A.C. dated 7-9-1994 regarding duty demand against the respondents. 2. The respondents are engaged in the manufacture of hand tools falling under chapter heading 82 of CETA. They filed c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Tribunal. 4. None has come present on behalf of respondents, although the notice was sent to them. The matter being old, we proceed to decide the same on merits. 5. We have perused impugned order passed by Collector (Appeals). He had dropped the demand against the respondents on the ground that the order of the A.C. regarding the classification of the product in question under chap....