2000 (5) TMI 276

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant. Shri R.S. Sangia, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. -  Arguing the case for the appellants, Shri M.H. Patil with Shri. G.A. Sindhe submits that a mistake has crept in the Tribunal's Final Order Nos. 540-541/99-D dated 2-6-1999 [1999 (113) E.L.T. 141 (Tri.) inasmuch a number of issues were contested by the applicants in their appeal memo. He submit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he direction that "there is a dispute on facts whether combing facility is available in the units of the two appellants before us or not. While no doubt, the adjudicating authority has referred to the report of the Asstt. Collector after a visit by him but we do not find on record any report submitted by the Asstt. Collector and there is only a passing references in the impugned order about Asstt.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nting their case, therefore the directions may be amended to include the contentions of M/s. Bombay Dyeing and may be considered for deciding the issue. 2. Shri R.S. Sangia, ld. JDR submits that all the points raised by the applicant now have been dealt with by the Collector in the impugned order. He submits that the applicant before the Collector submitted that they had no combing facility and....