Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (4) TMI 265

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. Shri V.M. Udhoji, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Shri Lakesh Pandey, ld. Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that a mistake has crept in, in the Final Order No. 845/99-D dated 30-9-1999. He submits that the appellants are manufacturing and clearing multifold straight cotton reels without payment of duty during the period May, 1993 to Feb., 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ad not containing synthetic staple fibres supplied in plain (straight) reel hanks whether single or multifold; that the rate of duty for this description of goods was 'Nil'. He submits that because of ignoring Notification No. 31/93 which was the relevant notification, there has been grave injustice to the appellants. He, therefore, prays that the order may be recalled and the appeal of the applic....