2000 (4) TMI 253

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amteke, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - After hearing both the sides on the stay application, it appeared that the main appeal itself could be taken up for disposal. Shri Ramtake submitted that the proceeding may be confined to the disposal of the stay application alone. We find that the same issue was before us earlier and very substantial arguments have ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the DRI. The panchanama shows that the machines earlier imported were installed and were operational in the said premises utilised in the manufacture of gold chains. The officers seized the 4 machines. On 13-3-1992, show cause notice was issued. The show cause notice mentioned that persons registered with the said Council were either manufacturer exporters or merchant exporters. It was mentioned t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion made in the show cause notice and ordered confiscation of the machines permitting their redemption on payment of fine of Rs. One lakh and imposed penalty of Rs. One lakh on the importers. The present appeal arises out of this order. 4. We have heard Shri H.C. Jain, advocate appearing along with Shri V.I. Dalvi, advocate for the appellants. Shri Ramtake, JDR appeared for the Revenue. ....