Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (3) TMI 295

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mar, DR, for the Respondents. [Order per: Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The lower authorities have denied the benefit of SSI exemption under Notification 175/86 to goods such as vibration Meters, Monitors and Analysers and parts thereof falling under Chapter 90 of the Schedule to the CETA, 1985 manufactured and cleared by the appellants on the classification list filed in 1990-91, for the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... reported in [2000 (115) E.L.T. 238] in which it has been held that the benefit of Small scale exemption under Notification 175/86 is not available to specified goods which are affixed with brand name or trade name of a foreign person. 3. We have carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the agreements dated 30-11-1997 and 25-10-1990 entered into between the appellant company an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the appellants links them with the goods of the other person (American Company) which are not entitled to the benefit of notification and hence we hold that the bar contained in para 7 of the Notification 175/86 is attracted in the present case. The argument of the learned Counsel for the appellants that 'IRD Mechanalysis' is not a brand name or trade name but only a house mark, cannot be accepted....