1999 (8) TMI 387

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri T. Premkumar, SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - All these appeals are being disposed of by a common Order as all of them arise out of the same impugned Order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta-I. Duty of Rs. 28,67,482.88 has been confirmed against the first appellants, M/s. Iswar Grinding Mills on the clear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....manufacture of hookah tobacco paste. 2. Whereas the Revenue's contention is that the activity undertaken by the appellants results in emergence of manufactured tobacco classifiable under sub-heading 2404.90, the appellants' contention is that the same remains manufactured tobacco classifiable under Tariff Heading 24.01. 3. Shri S.K. Roychowdhury, learned Advocate appearing for the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....7 (96) E.L.T. 712 (T). 4. We have also heard Shri T. Premkumar, learned SDR who reiterated the reasonings of the authorities below. 5. After carefully considering the submissions on both sides and going through the impugned Order, we find that all these judgments relied upon by the learned Advocate, were considered by this Bench in a recent Judgment delivered in the case of Shri Sh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l filed by the Revenue against the same. The distinction which the Commissioner has tried to draw between the decision of Shree Chand Agarwal and the facts of the present case, is not appreciable inasmuch as the classification of a product will not change depending upon its use in the manufacture of different final products. Whether the tobacco powder is used further in the manufacture of Gul or H....