Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (8) TMI 385

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Act regarding import of anhydrous ammonia vide Bill of Entry No. 641/17-3-1995 on the ground that the value thereof had been misdeclared by including additional freight to the tune of US $ 12 per M.T. 2. Heard Shri G. Prabhakar Sastry, ld. Advocate for appellants who submits that the question of misdeclaration of additional freight, etc. would only be applicable for consideration if there was any duty of Customs or additional duty of Customs payable on the goods imported. It is his contention that in view of Exemption Notification No. 24/94-Cus., dated 1-3-1994 as amended by 11/97, dated 1-3-1997 clearly exempts these goods from payment of duty as the same were for manufacture of ammonium nitrate which has been classified by the Ce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that ammonium nitrate manufactured and cleared by the party was actually used as a fertilizer by their customers as such a condition was not contained in the exemption notification under consideration. Ld. Advocate further submits that the wordings of the Customs notification as well as the Central Excise notification considered in this case are almost identical inasmuch as that the exemption is contained to any raw material used in the manufacture of fertilizer. There is no other end use condition in either of these notifications. Therefore, the ratio of this decision is also applicable to the facts of this case. 3. Heard Shri S. Kannan, ld. DR who reiterates the Order-in-Original. He submits that initially issue was one of allege....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the ground that the end product manufactured is not fertilizer. This is particularly so because both the Tariffs are based on the HSN. 5. We have considered the rival submissions and records of the case. We have also perused the exemption notification of Customs noted above. We find that the said notification exempts the product imported if the same is to be used for the manufacture of fertilizers. It is not disputed that the prilled ammonium nitrate manufactured by them has been classified by the jurisdictional Central Excise authorities under Chapter 31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act as fertilizer and that it has paid duty before it was cleared from the factory premises. We have also seen the two decisions cited above namely th....