1999 (7) TMI 303

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Das, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. -  Shri Jay Savla, ld. Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant had filed the stay petition and that in the stay petition they had submitted that the Hon'ble Bombay High Court had dispensed with pre-deposit of duty inasmuch as their prayers in the writ petition against Cols. A&B have been grante....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....their claim by adducing evidence before the adjudicating authority within one month of receipt of this order. As the appellants have contended that they did not have an opportunity of representing against the classification of impugned product under sub-heading 3204.29, the adjudicating authority will afford an opportunity of hearing to them for submitting their submissions on the classification a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s that on identical terms, their case may also be referred back to the adjudicating authority.  4.  Shri Sumit K. Das, ld. DR appearing for the respondent Commissioner submits that the facts in two cases are almost similar and therefore, he has no objection if the case is remanded to the adjudicating authority for redetermining the contentions as made out in the observations of this T....