1999 (4) TMI 305

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hi, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri G.B. Yadav, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. E/1634-V/95-BOM, E/635-V/95-BOM as well as E/636-V/95-BOM and along with Shri Dnyaneshwar S.S.K. Ltd. E/832-V/95-BOM. 2. These four appeals were argued by Shri K.P. Joshi, Advocate for the appellants. Shri G.B. Yadav represented....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner redetermined the price at Rs. 1950/- PMT on the basis of the purchase prices fixed by WMDC. He confirmed the differential duty. 5. Both manufactures then filed appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) Pune. Before the Commissioner it was claimed that a price of Rs. 850/- PMT was fixed by the Maharashtra Government. It was however; admitted that this price was not notified under any G....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iven and two other orders followed, the logic in the first order. On this observation he upheld all the lower orders. 7. We find that both the appellants captively consumed molasses manufactured by them. Since no quantity was sold by them, the valuation of comparable goods manufactured by other assessees would become the basis for determination of the assessable value of the goods so capti....