Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (10) TMI 334

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndent. [Order per : V.P. Gulati, Vice President]. - The issue in the appeal relates to the benefit of Notification 43/88 in respect of the Phenyldiamine which the appellants received under the certificate in terms of Chapter X and utilized the goods in the manufacture of another notified pesticide intermediate under Notification No. 43/88 which in turn was cleared by the appellants to another m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. Sandoz India Ltd. the manufacture of the pesticide. He has cited the judgement of the Tribunal in the context of the same notification where the issue involved was similar and reported in 1996 (86) 676 (Tribunal); C.C.E. v. United Phosporous. 2.  The ld. JDR adopted the reasoning of the ld. Lower authority. 3.  We have considered the pleas made by both sides. We observe that what ha....