1996 (10) TMI 334
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ndent. [Order per : V.P. Gulati, Vice President]. - The issue in the appeal relates to the benefit of Notification 43/88 in respect of the Phenyldiamine which the appellants received under the certificate in terms of Chapter X and utilized the goods in the manufacture of another notified pesticide intermediate under Notification No. 43/88 which in turn was cleared by the appellants to another m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s. Sandoz India Ltd. the manufacture of the pesticide. He has cited the judgement of the Tribunal in the context of the same notification where the issue involved was similar and reported in 1996 (86) 676 (Tribunal); C.C.E. v. United Phosporous. 2.  The ld. JDR adopted the reasoning of the ld. Lower authority. 3.  We have considered the pleas made by both sides. We observe that what ha....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI