1999 (11) TMI 234

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... REPRESENTED BY : Shri Rajesh Chandra Kumar, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S. Kannan, DR, for the Respondents. [Order per : V.K. Ashtana, Member (T)]. -  Since the issue involved in these appeals is identical, they are taken-up together by this single order. 2. Briefly, the issue concerns the classification of Iron Cast articles. While the Revenue seeks to classify them ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted 24-2-1995 had followed the ratio of the Order-in-Appeal No. 61/90, passed by that Commissioner (Appeals). This Order-in-Appeal No. 61/90, dated 6-7-1990 was considered in this final order of the Tribunal noted above. 4. Heard learned DR Shri S. Kannan, who reiterates. 5. We have carefully considered the rival submissions and records of the case. We find that the issue has been ....