1997 (2) TMI 341
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member (T)]. - Briefly stated, facts of the case are as follows : 1.1 The appellant herein imported a certain quantity of LDPE described as 'cable insulating compound'. The goods, executing the werehousing bond were warehoused. On 5-9-1989, the appellant cleared 10 metric tonnes of the aforesaid goods from warehouse after pay....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....989 cannot be given effect from 5-9-1989. This plea of the ld. Consultant is countered by the ld. JDR that this legal position that a notification is effective from its date is now well settled in terms of Apex Court's judgment in the case of M/s. Pankaj Jain Agencies v. Union of India reported in 1994 (72) E.L.T. 805 (S.C.). He, further, points out that further judgments from the Apex Court have ....
TaxTMI