Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (2) TMI 341

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member (T)]. -  Briefly stated, facts of the case are as follows : 1.1 The appellant herein imported a certain quantity of LDPE described as 'cable insulating compound'. The goods, executing the werehousing bond were warehoused. On 5-9-1989, the appellant cleared 10 metric tonnes of the aforesaid goods from warehouse after pay....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....989 cannot be given effect from 5-9-1989. This plea of the ld. Consultant is countered by the ld. JDR that this legal position that a notification is effective from its date is now well settled in terms of Apex Court's judgment in the case of M/s. Pankaj Jain Agencies v. Union of India reported in 1994 (72) E.L.T. 805 (S.C.). He, further, points out that further judgments from the Apex Court have ....