Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (6) TMI 164

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ne, for the Respondents. [Order per : Lajja Ram, Member (T)]. - In this appeal filed by the Revenue, the matter relates to the classification of the Tubular Steel Poles. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) had observed that there was no manufacturing involved in the activity of producing Tubular Steel Poles in the hands of the assessee. He had also observed at the same time that such P....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Item No. 26AA of the Central Excise Tariff but were classifiable under Item No. 68 of the said Tariff. From the Tribunal's aforesaid decision, it is clear that the process involved in processing the pipes and tubes to make poles amounted to the process of manufacture. We, therefore, consider that the view taken by the ld. Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) that no process of manufacture was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the goods were not correctly classifiable under Heading No. 73.06 we agree with the contention of the Revenue that they were correctly classifiable under Heading No. 73.08. 5. We find that the same impugned order had come up for consideration before the Tribunal and the Tribunal vide Final Order Nos. 497-498/99-B1, dated 5-5-1999 while disposing of the appeal by M/s. Shivaji Industries had....