1999 (6) TMI 164
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ne, for the Respondents. [Order per : Lajja Ram, Member (T)]. - In this appeal filed by the Revenue, the matter relates to the classification of the Tubular Steel Poles. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) had observed that there was no manufacturing involved in the activity of producing Tubular Steel Poles in the hands of the assessee. He had also observed at the same time that such P....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Item No. 26AA of the Central Excise Tariff but were classifiable under Item No. 68 of the said Tariff. From the Tribunal's aforesaid decision, it is clear that the process involved in processing the pipes and tubes to make poles amounted to the process of manufacture. We, therefore, consider that the view taken by the ld. Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) that no process of manufacture was....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the goods were not correctly classifiable under Heading No. 73.06 we agree with the contention of the Revenue that they were correctly classifiable under Heading No. 73.08. 5. We find that the same impugned order had come up for consideration before the Tribunal and the Tribunal vide Final Order Nos. 497-498/99-B1, dated 5-5-1999 while disposing of the appeal by M/s. Shivaji Industries had....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI