1999 (1) TMI 186

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. [Order]. - This is an appeal filed by the appellants against the decision of the Collector of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Pune where by the impugned order he had confirmed the order of the Assistant Collector rejecting the refund claim. 2. The appellants in this case are manufacturers of heating elements falling under Chapter Heading 8516.00 and clearing the same on paymen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... A.C. rejected the same on the ground that it was hit under provisions of sub-rule (3) of Rule 173L as the refund application has been filed beyond six months from the return of the goods. Against which the appeal was filed where the Collector (Appeals) rejected the appeal on the ground that the provisions do not require and the processing of the returned goods can be undertaken only after the go....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....de that they could not process the goods before it is verified and inspected by the jurisdictional Inspector. Because the inspection took place on 25-4-1990 and thereafter they have reprocessed the goods and cleared the same against payment of duty. They therefore feel that in terms of provisions of 173L they entitled for the refund. 4. I have gone through the grounds of appeal. In the abs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... upon the appellants to approach Principal Collector for extension of period as per Rule 173L(4) and on their failing to do so, they cannot be granted refund. The case law cited by them is of no help as in the present case there is no ambiguity in the provisions and the intention is amply clear i.e. the account should be rendered to the satisfaction of the Collector within six months unless this c....