Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (1) TMI 157

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tava, SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member (T)]. -  Heard both sides. 2. The Tribunal had already passed an order in relation to this appeal vide Final Order Nos. 332-333/97-A, dated 25-2-1997 deciding the question of inclusion of value of caps on the aluminium collapsible tubes in favour of the appellants herein. 3. An ROM application was filed by th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by the Revenue, the Tribunal recalled the aforesaid order dated 25-2-1997, in so far as it related to the present appeal. That order stands insofar as it relates to the other appeal, namely, E/3594/87-A. 5. We have now heard the learned Advocate, Shri G.P. Srivastava and the learned SDR, Shri K. Srivastava. We agree with the learned SDR that the subject appeal involved only the question of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... entries in RG 1 account. As regards the rejected material, the learned Advocate submits that these were rejected by the customers of the aluminium collapsible tubes who had returned the material to the appellants herein. A proper D-3 intimation had been given by the appellants to the concerned Revenue authorities. Therefore, there could not be any question of accounting the same and there is no r....