1999 (4) TMI 185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....avadivelu, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order]. -  These are five appeals by three appellants as above. As the issue concerned of the same and identical, i.e. quantum of redemption fine on import of cassia, therefore, the same is being considered together by this common order. 2. Heard Shri A.K. Jayaraj, learned Advocate for the appellants, who submits that the issue is already a cover....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore, he upheld the original authority's order on higher redemption fine. 3. Heard learned JDR Shri S. Sankaravadivelu. 4. On a careful consideration of the rival submissions and records of the case, I find that the matter is no longer res integra Vide Final Order Nos. 410 to 412/99, dated 23-2-1999 in the case of M.J. Enterprises, this Tribunal had considered this very Order-in-App....