Home / 
1999 (3) TMI 212
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y application is in regard to penalty of Rs. 10,000/. Arguing on the stay application, ld. Counsel, Shri K.B. Chakraborty submits that the only charge against the appellants is that the excess quantity of the goods had not been entered in the RG 1 register. He explained that the appellant's excise clerk was on leave from the middle of August, 1994 and that was the reason for non-entry of the goods....