TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1999 (3) TMI 210
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....san, Member (J)]. - By our Order No. 1928-30/98/WZB/C-II, dated 10-8-1998 we had directed the applicant Gaurang Mehta, to deposit an amount of Rs. 20 lakhs towards penalty within two months from that date out of penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs imposed on him by the Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), Mumbai. 2. Brief facts are that duty had been demanded and pen....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hoto Films which have been let off. When the Application C-Stay 1096/98 was heard the departmental representative stated that against those two persons the department were contemplating filing of appeals. 4. It is now contended by the ld. Counsel Shri J.C. Patel on behalf of the applicant that the order made by us should be reconsidered that since the applicant sold the goods on high sea sal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ha Chemicals in the Commissioner's Order, and dropping the proceedings against other buyers justified waiver of deposit in the applicant's case. However, we were told by the departmental representative then that the department was contemplating filing of appeals against the order of the Commissioner by the Department. We are now told by the ld. JDR Shri Ashokan that the department is not contempla....