Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (7) TMI 423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  Shri S.N. Ghosh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member (T)]. - Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as follows : 1.1 The applicants/appellants deposited an amount to Rs. 1,84,941/- as per Stay Order No. E/359/90-B1 passed by CEGAT, New Delhi in connection with Order (Original) No. 44 (7302.90) C.E.-11A/89/Collr.-3/90 dated 31-5-1990 passed by Commission....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....follows : "86. We may clarify at this stage that when the duty is paid under the orders of the Court (whether by way of an order granting stay, suspension, injunction or otherwise) pending an appeal/reference/ Writ Petition, it will certainly be a payment under protest; in such a case it is obvious it should not be necessary to lodge the protest as provided by Rule 233B." 2. Being a pay....