TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1999 (3) TMI 180
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Respondent. [Order]. - Notice was issued to the assessee for removing a consignment of copper wire for redrawing into thinner wire to M/s. Amar Wire without obtaining permission under Rule 57F and therefore demanding duty on the goods. It appears that the assessee did not reply. At the hearing before the Assistant Collector, the assessee contended that the goods were sent not to Amar Wir....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... appeal therefore contended that the permission for redrawing the wire, which it was stated was what was sent, was already available. It was also contended that the permission for sending the drawing was subsequently granted after nine months from the application sent by the assessee. 3. The Collector (Appeals) was persuaded by the later ground. He said that since the department had grante....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... this effect in the law, or the terms of the permission, it is not possible to say that the permission would cover removal that were made before the permission was actually granted. Therefore any removal of goods in anticipation prior to the grant of such permission would not be covered by such permission. 6. It is also contended by the Advocate of the respondent that the goods removed und....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in support. However, the heading mentioned is for 7108.11 which is for copper wire or refined copper exceeding cross sectional dimension of 6 mm. It is therefore not possible to conclude that what was removed was copper rod and not copper wire. 8. Even if the goods were copper wire rods, it would not really make a difference. The permission relied upon was granted under Notification 214/86....