Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (12) TMI 238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondents. [Order]. - This is party's appeal against the above captioned impugned order dated 1-12-1986 of Collector of Customs, Mumbai praying for setting aside the same, and to hold REP licence produced for clearance of 160 cartons containing 1920 rolls of PVC sheets valued at Rs. 1,02,653/- CIF imported from U.K. is valid, and for a direction to Department of issue detention certificat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the goods it appears that goods were wall papers and are in the nature of consumer goods, covered by Entry No. 121 of Appendix 2B part B AM of 85.88 Policy (Entry No. 104 of Appendix 2 part of AM 84-85 Policy) and are not covered by REP licence for product group C.AA.4 produced for the clearance of the goods. Sample of the goods were tested, out of 20% of goods detained by the department, after ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... above said allegations on 16-10-1986. The Appellant filed the reply through his advocate. Personal hearing was fixed on 30-11-1986. Shri O.P. Goenka, partner of the Appellant, submitted the arguments. After perusal of case records, impugned order was passed, releasing the balance of goods as per Bombay High Court order, and imposed the penalty of Rs. 3 lakhs on the Appellant under Section 112 of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rty's appeal is allowed in that case, which is not challenged and Department is bound by it. 3. Point for consideration whether this a fit case to allow ? My finding in the affirmative. 4. Perused the Exhibits A to K as per index, appeal memorandum, and orders in C/557/87-Bom. under No. 2200/95-WRB dated 14-11-1995, between the Appellant and department pertaining to 260 rolls of PV....