TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1997 (11) TMI 329
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Tilak, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of XLPE PVC power and Control Cables, which are generally supplied to State Electricity Boards. On a visit by Central Excise officers to their factory on 24-5-1996, they checked the stock of finished goods and raw-materials and compared the same with the statutory records. As a result of such check of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nged in the present appeal. 2. Shri Ashok Gupta, Director of the appellant firm is present for the hearing. He states that the goods, in question, were meant for supply to the Mysore State Electricity Board and the cables which had been packed in drums had the necessary embossing thereon to indicate that they were meant for the said customers. For these goods, one test, namely, high voltag....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e goods under this provision and for imposition of penalty. He pointed out that the appellant had packed the goods in drums and these were ready for removal. In the circumstances, the imposition of penalty and confiscation of the goods was justified and the fine in lieu of confiscation fixed as also the penalty amount were commensurate with the stakes involved as goods, in question, were valued at....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f the present case, it would appear that the adverse decision has been arrived at by the Commissioner on the ground that the goods, in question, had not been accounted for in the statutory records. The decision in Garden Silk Mills case was not taken with reference to the provisions of Rule 173Q(1)(b) regarding the confiscability of goods which are not accounted for by the manufacturer. In the sai....