1998 (5) TMI 177
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... T. Premkumar, SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member (T)]. - Briefly stated, facts of the case are as follows :- 1.1 The appellants herein in their classification list effective from 9-4-1990 declared two items namely, (a) Super Heater Element, (b) Spares for Super Heater (Return bend of all sizes and types). They claimed the classification of the said product unde....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....locomotive as commonly understood. We may say at this stage quite frankly, we have not understood these observations of the Assistant Collector. 1.3 On Appeal, the appellants herein did not succeed but the appellate authority simply endorsed the view of the Assistant Collector. Hence this Appeal before us. 2. Ld. Advocate, Shri N. Mookherjee draws attention to Note 2(a) of Secti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... that the purpose of the appeal is to classify the goods correctly even if the classification as canvassed by him was not under consideration at any such earlier stage; matter can be remanded to the authorities for considering the said classification in the light of such pleas as may be advanced by the appellants before the said authority. He also draws attention to the Explanatory Notes under Tar....
TaxTMI