1998 (10) TMI 201

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Jitender Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member (T)].  The controversy in the present case is whether sweetened partly skimmed milk powder (SPSMP) is the same as sweetened skimmed milk powder (SSMP). Lower appellate authority has, relying on Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment in the case of M/s. Food Specialities Ltd., reported in 1991 (51) E.L.T. 310 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ettled by the Apex Court judgment reported in 1998 (97) E.L.T. 402 (S.C.) by which Union of India's appeal against the judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Food Speciality case has been dismissed. Accordingly we dismiss this appeal of the Revenue. 4. Before we part with this product, we must record that the ld. JDR's submissions, that in the present case the respondents have conced....