Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (5) TMI 158

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. Shri R.K. Roy, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member (T)]. -  Heard both sides. 2. Revenue authorities booked a case against the appellants by a show cause notice dated 29-5-1992 for evading duty during the period 1987-88 on the basis of difference in sale figures as given in the balance sheet for the period ending on 31-3-1988 and as given in RG 1 for t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iscarded by the adjudicating authority on the grounds : (1) that peeling roller is classified differently than plywood. Therefore sale figures of peeling roller cannot be included in the sales figure of plywood. (2) Transport charges cannot form part of the sales figures as given in the balance sheet because the prices approved by the department were prices that is exclusive of the transport charg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... he submits that the explanations given by the appellant before the adjudicating authority are correct and the appeal should be allowed with consequential relief to the appellant. 4. Opposing the contentions ld. JDR Shri R.K. Roy reiterated the findings of adjudicating authority. We have carefully considered the pleas advanced from both sides. We observe that the case has been made out on ....