1998 (11) TMI 232

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant. Shri Satnam Singh, DR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - In this case, the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 has been denied to the appellants on the ground that during the period for which the demand has been raised and confirmed, the factory was not registered as a S.S.I unit. The appellants admittedly commenced production w.e.f. 19-11-1991 an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ibunal and of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 3. Opposing the prayer of the appellants, learned DR Shri Satnam Singh submits that the certificate does not in any way indicate that it is to take effect from any particular date and therefore, the certificate becomes effective only from 14-1-1992, the date of its issue and since admittedly the appellants did not have registration certificate for t....